<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO BizNiche &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seobizniche.com/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seobizniche.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Advice from the Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can You Get a Website Indexed with No Links and XML Sitemaps?</title>
		<link>http://seobizniche.com/google/can-you-get-a-website-indexed-with-no-links-and-xml-sitemaps/</link>
		<comments>http://seobizniche.com/google/can-you-get-a-website-indexed-with-no-links-and-xml-sitemaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEOBizNiche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobizniche.com/general/can-you-get-a-website-indexed-with-no-links-and-xml-sitemaps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend I was doing a little housekeeping on some of my domains and hosting accounts and decided to test and see if it was possible to get a website indexed using XML Sitemaps and no external links.Since some piano player in New Jersey owns the domain MichaelGray.com I had a few options but the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend I was doing a little housekeeping on some of my domains and hosting accounts and decided to test and see if it was possible to get a website indexed using XML Sitemaps and no external links.<span id="more-77"></span>Since some piano player in New Jersey owns the domain <a href="http://www.michaelgray.com">MichaelGray.com</a> I had a few options but the best was to go with my middle initial and byt the domain <a href="http://michaelagray.com/">MichaelAGray.com</a>. Since Im all about wordpress as a CMS I put the files up, put up my theme of choice <a title="thesis" href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/blogging/thesis-framework-seo/">thesis</a>, tweaked it with the <a href="http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/tools/reputation-thesis-skin/">thesis reputation skin</a>, and installed the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/">XML Sitemaps plugin</a>. I set it up to ping all of the search engines as shown below:<!--more--><a rel="shadowbox[post-2695];player=img;" href="http://seobizniche.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/5f179_xml-sitemap.png.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2696" title="xml-sitemap.png" src="http://seobizniche.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/5f179_xml-sitemap.png.jpg" alt="xml-sitemap.png" width="459" height="624" /></a></p>
<p>Within 4 days the homepage for the domain was showing in Bing and Google as shown below (yahoo just didnt love me enough)Im a big advocate of using sitemaps, and I think this demonstrates their effectiveness. Unless you have a really small site or really good site architecture, chances are some parts of your website arent as exposed, or well linked as others, and this helps you spoon feed the search engines your content insuring better crawling.</p>
<p>Thats not to say you should use sitemaps and not worry about spiders being able to crawl, because internal anchor text can play a huge role in SEO. However use on XML sitemaps as a redundant backup plan to help make sure you fully crawled and indexed.<small><a title="Attribution-ShareAlike License" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" target="_blank"><br />
</a><a title="D?ri" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/54977143@N00/3657785637/" target="_blank"></a></small></p>
<p>Need SEO help with your website, look at my <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/information/consulting/">SEO Consulting Services</a></p>
<p>This post originally came from <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/about-graywolf/">Michael Gray</a> who is an <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/information/consulting/">SEO Consultant</a>. Be sure not to miss the <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/blogs/thesis-wordpress-theme-review/">Thesis Wordpress Theme review</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/feed/">Go to Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seobizniche.com/google/can-you-get-a-website-indexed-with-no-links-and-xml-sitemaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Real, &amp; Yahoo All Sued for Music Store Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://seobizniche.com/search-optimization/microsoft-real-yahoo-all-sued-for-music-store-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://seobizniche.com/search-optimization/microsoft-real-yahoo-all-sued-for-music-store-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEOBizNiche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sued]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobizniche.com/general/microsoft-real-yahoo-all-sued-for-music-store-copyright-infringement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday,Microsoft, Yahoo, and Realwere named in a lawsuit filed by some music publishing companies claiming that each of their online music stores &#8211; Zune, Yahoo Music, and Rhapsody &#8211; infringe upon their copyrights. If youre shaking your head and wondering how that is possible, with all the royalties they pay out, youre not alone.This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday,Microsoft, Yahoo, and Realwere <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090630/0046095409.shtml">named in a lawsuit</a> filed by some music publishing companies claiming that each of their online music stores &#8211; Zune, Yahoo Music, and Rhapsody &#8211; infringe upon their copyrights. If youre shaking your head and wondering how that is possible, with all the royalties they pay out, youre not alone.<span id="more-81"></span>This copyright business is a real mess. As consumers we know not to illegally download music or share it online, or wecould potentiallyface crazy fines from the RIAA, such as the $1.92 million one recently handed down to Minnesota mom who downloaded 24 songs. For websites and companies looking to distribute or allow the playing of music on their sites, its far more complicated than that and the stakes are incredibly higher. In fact the copyright laws as related to music are so complicated that even places we consider to be legitimate sources are being slapped with lawsuits alledging infringements.</p>
<p>In the case of this latest lawsuit, the publishers claim that all three companies may have licensed the copyrights on the recordings, but didnt license the copyright on the compositions.There are a whole lot of details out yet explaining the legalities and issues at hand in the case, but it is assumedthese music services struck deals with record labels, but somehow the publishers and labels are separate entities and the rights are separate.</p>
<p>In many cases we assume that the publishing rights were also covered by the major record labels. But in some cases the publishing rights were owned by independent companies, and the claim looks to be that the publishing rights were never cleared with them.</p>
<p>What this means is that Microsoft, Yahoo and Real were all streaming music that they only had partial rights too. And since the publishers consider each instance a song is played to be an infringement yikes! They could be looking at some pretty hefty fines if the court agrees.</p>
<p>If youre interested in reading the entire court filing, which I will warn you is a massive 104 pages long, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/16950202/mcsvyahoocomplaint">here you go</a>. Have at it. In the meantime, well definitely be following this closely. Any ruling in favor of the music publishers could potentially have major ramifications for all three companies. I imagine that Google right now is pretty darn happy that theyve stayed out the music game, and that their search engine competitors are being tested.</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SearchEngineJournal">Go to Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seobizniche.com/search-optimization/microsoft-real-yahoo-all-sued-for-music-store-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
